<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Models on ArcticDBA - Alexander Arvidsson</title>
    <link>/tags/models/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Models on ArcticDBA - Alexander Arvidsson</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>The Map Is Not the Territory — But Maybe the Ontology Is</title>
      <link>/posts/map-is-not-the-territory/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/map-is-not-the-territory/</guid>
      <description>For years I thought dimensional models were about organizing data and making queries fast. That&amp;rsquo;s true, but it&amp;rsquo;s profoundly incomplete. Dimensional models describe how we store facts. They don&amp;rsquo;t describe what those facts mean. That gap shows up the moment someone asks a question your star schema wasn&amp;rsquo;t designed for. Ontologies solve a different problem: formal, machine-readable definitions of business concepts and their relationships. With Microsoft now shipping Fabric IQ, this conversation isn&amp;rsquo;t academic anymore.</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="/posts/map-is-not-the-territory/cover.jpg" />
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
